<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Pictures and Info on the Sidekick Slide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hiptop3.com/archives/more-pictures-and-info-on-the-sidekick-slide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hiptop3.com/archives/more-pictures-and-info-on-the-sidekick-slide/</link>
	<description>Your source for rumors and speculations about leaked Sidekick/Hiptop info</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr2Sense</title>
		<link>http://www.hiptop3.com/archives/more-pictures-and-info-on-the-sidekick-slide/#comment-8045</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr2Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 07:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hiptop3.com/?p=251#comment-8045</guid>
		<description>I'm curious, why doesn't the actual Sidekick Slide look like the first two pictures above? Oh well... It doesn't matter. (I still like the Slide! :-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious, why doesn&#8217;t the actual Sidekick Slide look like the first two pictures above? Oh well&#8230; It doesn&#8217;t matter. (I still like the Slide! :-))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.hiptop3.com/archives/more-pictures-and-info-on-the-sidekick-slide/#comment-8007</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 01:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hiptop3.com/?p=251#comment-8007</guid>
		<description>The first picture looks prety authentic, as well as the second. But the third picture looks sus, because it doesn't look anything like the first 2 pictures. If these are just hox pictures they are prety good considering the detail put into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first picture looks prety authentic, as well as the second. But the third picture looks sus, because it doesn&#8217;t look anything like the first 2 pictures. If these are just hox pictures they are prety good considering the detail put into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kickbackcat</title>
		<link>http://www.hiptop3.com/archives/more-pictures-and-info-on-the-sidekick-slide/#comment-8006</link>
		<dc:creator>kickbackcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hiptop3.com/?p=251#comment-8006</guid>
		<description>yeah the top pic shows it with a straight up and down keyboard and with a D-pad and the spec sheet shows it was the slanted Sidekick keyboard and with no D-Pad.  hoping it keeps the slanted Sidekick keyboard but i dont like the slider. can't top the rotating screen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah the top pic shows it with a straight up and down keyboard and with a D-pad and the spec sheet shows it was the slanted Sidekick keyboard and with no D-Pad.  hoping it keeps the slanted Sidekick keyboard but i dont like the slider. can&#8217;t top the rotating screen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s4xton</title>
		<link>http://www.hiptop3.com/archives/more-pictures-and-info-on-the-sidekick-slide/#comment-8005</link>
		<dc:creator>s4xton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hiptop3.com/?p=251#comment-8005</guid>
		<description>This TOTALLY blows away the iPhone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This TOTALLY blows away the iPhone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ncmacasl</title>
		<link>http://www.hiptop3.com/archives/more-pictures-and-info-on-the-sidekick-slide/#comment-8003</link>
		<dc:creator>ncmacasl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hiptop3.com/?p=251#comment-8003</guid>
		<description>note pics show 2 DIFFERENT keyboard styloes.  1 with an offset standard like a normal keyboard (and all prev SK models) and 1 with lined up rows and columns.

Hope traditional version wins out,  not sure if my digits can learn a new trick!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>note pics show 2 DIFFERENT keyboard styloes.  1 with an offset standard like a normal keyboard (and all prev SK models) and 1 with lined up rows and columns.</p>
<p>Hope traditional version wins out,  not sure if my digits can learn a new trick!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
